Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Keep Calm and Carry On

KEY POINTS

If US tariffs stay at their new level, both the US and the Euro area could experience a “brush with recession” in the second half of this year.
It’s not necessarily “1930 redux”. A protectionist spiral can still be avoided.

After Liberation Day, US tariffs have been multiplied by 10 relative to the “pre-Trump” level. If they were to stay at their new level – i.e. if still elusive negotiations do not start and resolve quickly – the impact on consumers’ purchasing power, corporate margins and hence investment could push the US economy into a brush with recession in the second half of this year. Beyond that point, a lot will depend on the Fed’s appetite to accommodate the shock. While we have little doubt that, once clear signs of labour market deterioration appear, the Fed will resume cutting, we do not think it will necessarily go very far into accommodative territory. Long-term credibility matters to central bankers, and they will take the risk of over-reacting very seriously. This could trigger a more direct conflict between the White House and the central bank. 

Europe will be hard hit as well. Even if the shock is smaller than in the US, the Euro area economy was already soft before Liberation Day and the additional hit on exports and confidence may also trigger a brush with recession later this year – with more space in our view for the ECB to accommodate though, as disinflation should continue. The key questions for Europe now revolve around retaliation. We think there is good argument for “readying” the retaliation measures without implementing them straightaway. If we are right and the US economy slows down quickly, this could change the political balance in the US, and if it is obvious that Europe bears no effective responsibility in this state of affairs, the “European case” could be stronger if/when negotiations start in earnest. 

The US move on 2 April naturally draws attention to scary historical precedents, such as the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930 which prolonged the great depression and impaired global trade. However, the protectionist spiral of the 1930s was largely explained by the constraints of the Gold Standard. Governments today have more choice. If they keep their composure, there is still a space for the old, rule-based trade framework.

Download the full article
Download Macrocast #265 (479.25 KB)
Newsletter

Subscribe to updates

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

The information you have included in the form will be added to our contact list database for the purpose of sending you our publications by email. You may unsubscribe at any time by using the link at the bottom of the email you receive.

To try again, please refresh this page or come back later. For technical assistance, please email us at: axa-im@uk.dstsystems.com

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE NOW
Subscribe to updates.

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Neither MSCI nor any other party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the MSCI data makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such data (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such data. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages. No further distribution or dissemination of the MSCI data is permitted without MSCI’s express written consent. 

    Back to top