Investment Institute
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Back to the 1990s

  • 10 October 2022 (7 min read)

Key points:

  • US payroll data last week strengthen the Fed’s resolve. The market’s stubborn hopes for a dovish pivot – despite being repeatedly dashed by the dataflow - reflect a refusal to accept a profound shift in policymaking. Rather than the 1970s, we think the 1990s provide the best historical analogies with our current predicament. 

Investors’ propensity to hope for an imminent “dovish pivot” – although it was defeated again by robust US payroll data last week - reflects a habituation to the regime of the last 20 years, when central banks could come to the rescue of the real economy and the market, since their primary mission – price stability – was fulfilled irrespective of cyclical conditions thanks to powerful structural forces. Inflation re-emerging put an end to this. We don’t need to return to the Volcker moment of 1980 to define the new policy era. Remembering the 1990s is enough.

Policymakers in the 1990s had to deal with significant supply-side shocks triggered by geopolitical events. They had to cope with insufficient international policy cooperation. While in 1990 the Fed accommodated an adverse supply-side inflation spike, in 1994 it engaged in a rapid tightening to curb excess demand and maintained it despite significant market turmoil. The US is not the only place where central banks were not the “market’s best friend” in the 1990s: under the currency arrangement of the time, most European countries went through the decade with a level of real interest rates far too high relative to their domestic macro conditions.

In Europe, the exit from a series of recessions and financial stability accidents to which inappropriate monetary policy heavily contributed took the form of more integration, with monetary union. This should be a lesson for today, as governments are struggling with defining Euro-wide solutions.  Beyond institutional change, at least the 1990s ended up on a positive note, with the promise of favourable supply-side shocks. One, which proved disappointing, was the belief in a significant boost to productivity from the adoption of New Information and Communication Technologies. The other, globalization, proved more lasting and effective. Unfortunately, with mediocre productivity gains for years and deglobalization becoming a major theme, uplifting narratives are currently missing.   

Download the full insight
Download insight (515.98 KB)

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Subscribe to updates.

Related Articles

Viewpoint Chief Economist

Taking the Plunge

Viewpoint Chief Economist

The (welcome) Return of Boring

Viewpoint Chief Economist

Independence Wars Ahead?


    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Issued in the UK by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068. Registered Office: 22 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4BQ

    In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.

    Back to top