The Pitfalls of the Inflation Blame Game


  • We fail to see the upside for the ECB in focusing on profit margins as a key factor behind inflation persistence
  • Deposit migration is a normal feature – but non-banks cannot take up all the “funding slack” left by banks.

Core inflation accelerated again in March in the Euro area, while the decline energy prices, which is helping to push headline inflation down, could be jeopardized by the latest supply cut announced over the weekend by OPEC. The ECB’s frustration is understandable, but we are concerned by their focus on resilient profit margins as the main factor behind inflation persistence. Such line of communication could strengthen the position of those who argue for a very large catch-up in wages. This would weaken the ECB’s message of caution to the stakeholders in the wage bargaining process. More fundamentally, we fail to see the upside for the central bank in insisting on corporate pricing behaviour, which, unlike wage bargaining, is completely decentralized. While unions may internalize in their reaction function the adverse consequences for job creation that large interest rate hikes would have if wages accelerated too much, there is no organized “pricing coordination” system in the corporate sector – nor should there be, as per the EU’s very own pro-competition stance. Where there is no obstacle to competition, excess profit margins usually reflect lingering pockets of excess demand – otherwise, by construction firms could not sustain higher markups. It’s up to the central bank to determine whether more hikes are needed to deal with these pockets.

Market indicators suggest some measure of calm has come back in the banking industry, and the Fed’s latest data show that small banks stopped losing deposits. However, the deposit base continues to erode in the aggregate US banking sector. We look at the last 40 years to show that deposit migrations towards non-banks – or at least towards more expensive resources for banks - are not exceptional but are a regular reaction to monetary tightening. We however cast a doubt at the idea that non-banks could take up all the “credit slack” left by banks. Risks aversion is rife, and disintermediated funding may favour governments over private actors, as the recent developments in US money market funds suggest.

The Pitfalls of the Inflation Blame Game
Download the full article (529.5 KB)

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE NOW
Subscribe to updates.

Related Articles

Market Updates

What will a new US President mean for markets and the global economy?

Market Updates

AXA IM US election reaction: what Trump's win means for markets and investors

Market Updates

Short duration update

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Issued in the UK by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068. Registered Office: 22 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4BQ

    In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.

    Back to top