Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Where’s inflation?

KEY POINTS

The escalation in the Middle East adds another layer of uncertainty
US inflation is still tame. The pass-through from tariffs could be slower than in 2018-2019
Waller makes a good “dovish case” for the Fed – but that is not for immediate consumption: Fed should stick to a “wait and see” attitude for now

The FOMC meets again this week with no less uncertainty, overall, than last month. True, the trade confrontation has given way to talks – even if their outcome remains unclear – but at the same time the exacerbation of tension in the Middle East puts in doubt what had been one of the very few tailwinds benefiting the world economy recently: the decline in oil prices. There are two parameters which we will closely monitor to assess the risk of a persistent oil shock: how Gulf states – and particularly Saudi Arabia – position themselves on oil supply, and the likelihood of a disruption in oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. It is early days, but on balance the risk still seems containable.

Were it not for the exogenous shocks – tariffs and oil – it seems that the Fed has successfully concluded the post-pandemic policy cycle, to borrow from Christine Lagarde’s expression about the ECB two weeks ago. The May print for the US CPI was particularly encouraging. It is getting surprising that no tangible sign that the tariffs are starting to bite has emerged, as even core manufactured goods prices were tame, apparently disproving the Fed’s assessment of the first trade war of 2018-2019 of a rapid pass-through. However, a key difference between now and then is that the level of preparation of US stakeholders was much higher this time. Inventory building may delay the transmission.

While the re-affirmation of the Fed’s “wait and see attitude” is highly likely this week, the FOMC dot plot for 2026 and 2027 could reflect some divergence across members, with hawkish and dovish clusters appearing, divided over the risks of inflation persistence in the US. We explore in detail the recent speech by Christopher Waller, which very neatly makes the dovish case. Some of his arguments are seductive, but the ongoing crackdown on immigration weakens his point on the normalisation of US labour supply. Besides, his views matter more for the terminal rate – whether the Fed could go all the way into accommodation – than for the next few months of US monetary policy.

Download the full article
Download Macrocast #274 (521.05 KB)

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE NOW
Subscribe to updates.

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Neither MSCI nor any other party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the MSCI data makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such data (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such data. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages. No further distribution or dissemination of the MSCI data is permitted without MSCI’s express written consent. 

    Back to top