Investment Institute
Viewpoint Chief Economist

War made the State

  • 07 March 2022 (7 min read)

Key Points

  • The consequences of the war in Ukraine will be unequal across social groups in Europe. Redistributive pressure will add to the fiscal drift triggered by the acceleration in the energy transition and the rise in military spending.
  • The ECB is probably ready to slow down its policy normalization, but the direction of travel remains clear. It would be wrong to count on debt monetization to make this fiscal drift painless.

Major political economy shifts often coincide with wars or preparation of wars. They do not simply affect how resources are affected to defend against external threats. They also shape priorities on civil spending to maximize internal social cohesion. Building a comprehensive welfare state as a demonstration of the West’s superiority against the Communist bloc was part and parcel of the cold war. Fighting Covid was a “near war experience” which has accelerated a pendulum shift towards interventionism again. In western societies, the awareness of deep divisions before the pandemic, reflected in the rise of populism, probably played a role. Without massive support to household income and job security, they may not have been able to withstand the degree of collective and individual constraints made necessary by the sanitary situation.

European economies and societies are going to be tested again by the Ukraine war. While polls suggest public opinion is ready to accept some economic sacrifice because of the sanctions against Russia, additional fiscal support is unavoidable. The distribution of the shock across social groups is likely to be highly unequal.  The surge in inflation will be the most intense for energy and food, two items which stand for a high share of the consumption basket at the bottom of the income ladder. This “redistributive pressure” will add to the acceleration in the energy transition and the rise in military spending in a new fiscal drift.

A major difference with the pandemic is that the ECB is not in the same situation to help governments fund a new rise in public debt. This time, inflation is the first manifestation of the crisis in the economic realm, not a lagged effect. While this week we expect Christine Lagarde to communicate a slower pace of policy normalization than could have been expected after the February meeting, we think the general direction of travel has not changed.  In uncertain times central bankers tend to react with two historical precedents in mind. One is the policy mistake of maintaining a too hawkish stance during the Great Depression of the 1930s. The other is the symmetric policy mistake of maintaining a too dovish stance during the 1970s.  They have spent the last 14 years reading Bernanke’s “Essays on the great depression”. They might be dusting their Milton Friedman now. The fiscal drift is not going to be painless.

 

Download the Insight
Download report (381.39 KB)

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE NOW
Subscribe to updates.

Related Articles

Viewpoint Chief Economist

Draghi Captures the Zeitgeist

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 26 February 2024 (7 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Zoom on the Boom

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 12 February 2024 (10 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Postcard from Davos

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 22 January 2024 (7 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Back to top